Blog

Do you buy lottery tickets ?&nbsp; There is a better alternative. Just buy a lottery miner and participate to win the block reward, of 3.125 bitcoin's or around 300.000$.Bitaxe is a small, affordable, open-source ASIC miner, making Bitcoin solo mining accessible to hobbyists, while solo mining means a miner uses their own hardware independently to find a Bitcoin block and claim the entire reward, a high-risk, high-reward strategy contrasting with pool mining where power is shared for consistent, smaller payouts.&nbsp; BitaxeWhat it is: A compact, low-cost, open-source Bitcoin miner using a single ASIC chip.Purpose: To lower the barrier to entry for home Bitcoin mining, enabling hobbyists to participate in decentralization and solo mine.Features: Simple setup, WiFi connectivity, low power consumption (a few dollars a month), and moderate hash power (hundreds of GH/s to 1 TH/s).&nbsp;While there's no exact, real-time count, tens of thousands of Bitaxe devices are active, with some sources mentioning over 50,000 units hashing globally by mid-2025, though precise network connection numbers fluctuate, with typical units connecting to 10-30 peers for decentralization rather than a single connection.&nbsp;These small, home-focused miners contribute to Bitcoin's decentralization, but their total number is less significant than large industrial miners.&nbsp;Solo MiningConcept: A single miner competes against the entire network to solve complex mathematical problems to validate transactions and earn the block reward (currently 3.125 BTC plus fees).Pros: Keep 100% of the reward, no pool fees, promotes network decentralization.Cons: Extremely low probability of success due to high network hash rates, leading to unpredictable income. Contrast with Pool Mining:Solo: Lottery-style, huge rewards (if lucky) or nothing; high odds, zero payouts.Pool: Combines hash power, regular smaller payouts; consistent income, shared rewards.&nbsp;In essence, Bitaxe provides the hardware for individuals to attempt the challenging feat of solo mining, which offers the ultimate prize but requires significant luck against industriaHow Odds Are Calculated (Simplified)Your Share of the Network: Your odds are your device's hashrate (computational power) divided by the total network hashrate.Network Hashrate: The total Bitcoin network hashrate is massive (e.g., hundreds of Exahashes/second in mid-2025).Bitcoin Difficulty: The network automatically adjusts difficulty every two weeks, making it harder to find blocks as more power joins.&nbsp;Example Odds for a ~1.3 TH/s Bitaxe (as of mid-2025/early 2026):&nbsp;Per Block (Every ~10 mins): ~1 in 461 million.Per Day (144 blocks): ~1 in 3.2 million.Per Month (4,320 blocks): ~1 in 107,000.&nbsp;The Reality of Solo MiningExtremely Rare Wins: Despite these numbers, some people using low-power Bitaxe devices have successfully mined entire blocks, receiving the full reward (around 3.125 BTC plus fees).Lottery Analogy: Solo mining with a small device is best understood as buying a lottery ticket, where each block is a drawing, and your hashrate determines the number of tickets you hold.&nbsp; In Summary: You're statistically unlikely to mine a block solo with a Bitaxe, but it's a fun way to participate in Bitcoin's decentralized ethos, and occasionally, sheer luck rewards miners who defy the odds.&nbsp; You can buy one here @solosatoshi_ #bitcoin #btc #mining #money news

Do you buy lottery tickets ? There is a better alernative.

Golden USDC coins isometric seamless patttern. 3d illustration.

As crypto market structure legislation inches forward in Washington, one issue has come to dominate the debate: whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to share their economic upside with users or third parties.The banking lobby has labeled this a “stablecoin loophole.” Congress, however, was explicit in the Genius Act about its intent on yield. More importantly, it is difficult to justify calling a consumer benefit a loophole—especially when it puts more money directly into the hands of ordinary Americans.Unfortunately, much of the discussion around stablecoins and banking has been derailed by exaggerated fears and shaky assumptions. Below are five of the most common myths—and why they don’t hold up under scrutiny. Myth #1: Stablecoin Growth Will Drain Bank DepositsReality: Stablecoins may actually increase U.S. bank deposits.The assumption that stablecoins and bank deposits are always substitutes is incorrect. In practice, stablecoin growth has so far added to the U.S. banking system, not depleted it. Here’s why:Most stablecoin demand comes from abroad, where access to U.S. dollars is limited.Major stablecoin issuers back their tokens with bank deposits and Treasury bills, a requirement that the Genius Act would further formalize.When foreign users demand stablecoins, issuers must increase reserves—much of which end up as deposits in U.S. banks. Even the Treasury portion of reserves supports banking activity, since buying, selling, repo financing, FX settlement, and custody all require bank balance sheets.In short, every additional dollar of stablecoin issuance today tends to create more banking activity, not less.Moreover, yield-bearing stablecoins would likely increase demand further, especially internationally. More global dollar adoption means more dollars flowing back into the U.S. financial system.Bottom line: Stablecoins expand global dollar demand. For the foreseeable future, that is more likely to support bank deposits than undermine them. Myth #2: Stablecoins Will Reduce Banks’ Ability to LendReality: Deposit competition affects bank profits—not credit availability.Competition for deposits does not automatically reduce lending. It reduces margins.U.S. banking is currently one of the most profitable industries in the economy:Bank stocks have performed exceptionally wellNet interest margins are near historic highsThe industry captured roughly $1 trillion in excess net-interest profits over a recent two-year periodBanks have multiple tools to respond to deposit competition:Pay savers more interest, as competitive industries routinely doReduce excess reserves held at the Federal Reserve, which currently total close to $3 trillion—far above regulatory requirementsThese reserves earn banks a risk-free return but are economically idle. They can easily be redeployed to support lending if deposits decline at the margin.Protecting bank profitability is not the same thing as protecting credit creation. Congress should not confuse the two.Bottom line: Banks can compete for deposits without reducing lending. Stablecoins threaten margins, not credit. Myth #3: Banks Are the Backbone of U.S. Credit and Must Be ShieldedReality: Banks provide only a minority of U.S. credit.Banks account for roughly 20% of total credit to households and businesses in the U.S. Most lending comes from:Mortgage securitization marketsMoney market fundsInsurance companiesPrivate credit funds and non-bank lendersEven for small businesses, a substantial share of lending already comes from outside the traditional banking system. This matters because even in a worst-case scenario—where stablecoins reduce bank deposits and banks fail to respond competitively—the impact on overall credit conditions would likely be modest.In fact, stablecoin adoption could lower borrowing costs:Stablecoins increase demand for U.S. TreasuriesTreasury yields serve as benchmarks for most non-bank creditLower government borrowing costs can translate into cheaper mortgages and business loansBottom line: The U.S. credit system does not hinge on bank deposits. Stablecoins could coexist with—or even improve—credit conditions. Myth #4: Community Banks Are the Most at RiskReality: Large “money-center” banks face greater competitive pressure.Stablecoins are primarily payment instruments, not relationship-based lending tools. As such, they compete more directly with:Wire transfersCross-border paymentsLarge-scale transaction bankingThese services are dominated by large global banks, not community institutions. Community banks:Already pay higher deposit ratesServe older, relationship-driven customer basesFocus on localized lending (e.g., agriculture, small-town mortgages)It defies common sense to assume that a rural depositor will abandon a trusted local bank for a crypto-native payment product.This myth persists largely because it serves two interest groups:Large banks seeking regulatory protectionCrypto firms trying to sell infrastructure to smaller banksBottom line: If stablecoins disrupt anyone, it is far more likely to be large payments-focused banks than community lenders. Myth #5: Borrowers Matter, Savers Don’tReality: Lending is a two-sided market—and savers matter deeply.Restricting stablecoin issuers from sharing yield is effectively a policy choice to protect bank shareholders at the expense of savers.That is a strange priority.Saving is not a nuisance—it is the foundation of financial resilience. Many Americans, particularly retirees, rely on interest income. Yield-bearing stablecoins simply offer another option, not a mandate.It is also worth noting that stablecoin yields largely originate from U.S. Treasury interest, which ultimately comes from taxpayers. There is no principled reason why this income should flow exclusively to bank equity holders rather than to households.Competition that benefits savers is not a loophole—it is how markets are supposed to work. Bottom line: Savers and borrowers both matter. Innovation that improves outcomes for savers should not be reflexively blocked. Conclusion: Banking Will Be Fine—Progress Should ContinueIf Apple tried to ban better smartphones instead of improving its own, we’d laugh. If legacy automakers tried to outlaw EVs instead of building better cars, we’d object. Digital dollars are no different.Most of the fears surrounding stablecoins are speculative, unproven, and rooted in protecting incumbent profits rather than consumers or financial stability. The Genius Act already addressed the core policy questions around stablecoins. Prolonging the debate serves little purpose.The U.S. banking system is robust, profitable, and adaptable. It does not need protection from competition—it needs incentives to evolve.Stablecoins are not a threat to American finance. They are part of its next chapter.

Eliminating the Biggest Myths About Stablecoins, Banking, and Credit.

A few years ago, the idea that Bitcoin mining could support climate action would have sounded absurd. Today, the evidence tells a very different story.Since 2021, the Bitcoin mining industry has undergone a profound transformation. Improved data quality, peer-reviewed research, and a rapid shift toward renewable energy have reshaped the debate. According to recent estimates, over 52% of Bitcoin mining is now powered by sustainable energy, making it one of the most electrified industries in the world.More importantly, scientific consensus is forming. Fourteen of the last sixteen academic papers examining Bitcoin and energy conclude that mining can deliver net positive environmental outcomes. Even mainstream media coverage has shifted tone since 2023, with a growing majority acknowledging Bitcoin mining’s potential role in decarbonization.Yet until now, few analyses have brought together the full picture — combining grid economics, real-world case studies, methane mitigation, heat reuse, and renewable R&amp;D — into a single climate thesis. This article attempts to do exactly that.Debunking the Old Environmental CritiquesClaims that Bitcoin mining is uniquely harmful due to emissions, water usage, or “energy per transaction” metrics have largely been discredited in recent years. These arguments rely on outdated assumptions and flawed methodologies that ignore how the Bitcoin network actually operates.Peer-reviewed research — including Sai &amp; Vranken (2023) — demonstrates that transaction-based energy metrics are fundamentally misleading. Earlier critiques are now contradicted by both empirical data and real-world deployments, explored in depth in studies such as “Is Bitcoin Good or Bad for the Environment?” With those misconceptions addressed, the more important question becomes:How can Bitcoin mining actively accelerate climate solutions?The Four Biggest Climate Challenges Technology Must SolveFrom the perspective of climate-tech investors and grid engineers, four near-term challenges dominate the energy transition:Unlocking renewable energy bottlenecksReplacing fossil-fuel heat with electrified heatAccelerating renewable R&amp;DEnding carbon-intensive practices like gas peaker plants, methane venting, and flaring Bitcoin mining intersects with all four.1. Unlocking Renewable Energy BottlenecksThe Problem: Grid Constraints and Wasted EnergyRenewable projects face systemic barriers:Interconnection queues can delay projects 10–15 yearsSolar and wind curtailment wastes massive amounts of energyInvestors face long payback periods (8–10+ years)Grid operators lack flexible demand to balance intermittencyAustralia alone wastes roughly 25% of its renewable energy output due to curtailment. How Bitcoin Mining Solves ThisBitcoin mining functions as a location-agnostic, interruptible energy buyer. Unlike traditional industry, miners can operate:Off-gridBehind the meterAnywhere energy is cheap or strandedThis allows renewable projects to generate revenue immediately, even before grid interconnection. Examples include:West Texas wind farms monetizing surplus energyEthiopia’s GERD dam earning $55M in under a year from excess hydroERCOT grid seeing lower curtailment and higher renewable profitability Academic studies (You et al., 2023; Menati et al., 2023) confirm that mining reduces financial risk and accelerates renewable deployment.2. Shortening Payback Periods for RenewablesRenewable energy often suffers from long capital recovery timelines. However, pairing renewables with Bitcoin mining can cut payback periods from ~8 years to ~3.5 years. This isn’t theoretical:Deutsche Telekom now mines Bitcoin with surplus wind and solarTEPCO in Japan is using mining to monetize curtailed renewablesMining revenue is being reinvested into new clean generationThe result: faster scaling, lower investor risk, and more renewables built sooner. 3. Creating Demand-Side Flexibility for the GridGrids dominated by solar and wind require flexible demand, not just flexible supply.Bitcoin miners can:Ramp down within seconds during peak demandAbsorb excess power during overproductionAct as a “shock absorber” for grid instabilityFormer ERCOT CEO Brad Jones credited Bitcoin mining with:Stabilizing Texas’ grid after Winter Storm UriEnabling higher renewable penetrationAvoiding billions in new gas peaker plant costsFew industries can offer this level of responsiveness at scale. 4. Replacing Fossil-Fuel Heat with Electrified HeatHeating accounts for roughly 50% of global energy use, most of it fossil-based.Bitcoin mining produces constant, high-grade waste heat — and that heat is already being reused at scale. Real-World Applications:District heating: Bitcoin mining now heats ~80,000 residents in FinlandResidential heating: ASIC-powered heaters for homesGreenhouses: Reducing natural gas use in Dutch horticultureLumber drying, fish farming, distilleries, pools, bathhousesThis turns Bitcoin miners into electric heat engines that displace gas-based systems. 5. Accelerating Renewable R&amp;DBitcoin mining is uniquely capable of de-risking experimental energy technologies. Ocean Thermal Energy (OTEC)Once abandoned due to high grid-connection costs, OTEC is being revived by companies like OceanBit, using Bitcoin mining as an on-site energy buyer to fund R&amp;D without grid dependency. Renewable Microgrids in AfricaGridless Compute uses Bitcoin mining to stabilize microgrids in Kenya, Malawi, and Zambia — already electrifying tens of thousands of rural residents by monetizing surplus energy. Mining acts as a “digital battery”, turning fragile microgrids into viable infrastructure. 6. Ending Methane Venting, Flaring, and Gas Peaker PlantsGas Peaker PlantsIn Texas alone, 3 GW of Bitcoin mining load now participates in demand response, saving taxpayers an estimated $18 billion by avoiding new peaker plants. Landfill MethaneMobile mining units convert landfill methane into electricity on-site, eliminating emissions and generating revenue. Just 35 mid-sized landfills could make the entire Bitcoin network carbon-negative. Oilfield FlaringCompanies like Crusoe, Upstream Data, and Unblock Global are cutting flaring by up to 99%, mitigating millions of tons of CO₂-equivalent emissions annually. The World Economic Forum has publicly recognized these efforts. The Bigger Picture: Carbon Payback TimeBitcoin mining currently emits ~40–46 Mt CO₂e annually. Context matters. Solar power itself took 57 years to reach net-positive carbon impact. Early-stage climate technologies always carry initial emissions. Bitcoin mining:Cuts methane (84× more potent than CO₂)Replaces more carbon-intensive systems (banking, gold mining)Funds renewable infrastructure at scaleEvaluated properly, its future abatement potential far exceeds its current footprint.Conclusion: Bitcoin Mining Is Tier-1 Climate InfrastructureBitcoin mining is no longer a speculative climate idea. It is already: Unlocking stranded renewable energyStabilizing grids with high renewable penetrationReplacing fossil-fuel heatingEliminating methane emissionsAccelerating clean-energy R&amp;DPreserving ecosystems like Virunga National Park Rejecting Bitcoin mining today risks prolonging reliance on gas peakers, flaring, and fossil heat.In the race to net-zero, Bitcoin mining is not theoretical — it is operational.

Why Bitcoin Mining May Be One of the Most Important Climate Innovations of the Century

Digital Money Background. Digital Screen with Bitcoin Crypto Currency Symbol connected in to Network With data and Coding. Blockchain and E-Wallets Technology Background

Bitcoin’s mining difficulty recorded a modest decline in its first adjustment of 2026, marking a pause after a year of repeated all-time highs that pushed miners to their limits.The Bitcoin network difficulty — a measure of how hard it is to mine a new block — slipped to 146.4 trillion, according to network data. This adjustment reflects slightly faster-than-target block production during the previous period. Next Difficulty Adjustment Expected to Rise AgainDespite the recent dip, the next difficulty recalibration is already projected to move higher. Data from CoinWarz estimates that the next adjustment, expected around Jan. 22, 2026, could increase mining difficulty to approximately 148.2 trillion.At the time of writing, average block times stand at 9.88 minutes, marginally below Bitcoin’s 10-minute target. When blocks are found too quickly, the network responds by increasing difficulty to maintain stability. Mining Difficulty Still Below November PeakWhile 2025 saw multiple record-breaking difficulty increases, the current level remains well below the all-time high of 155.9 trillion, reached in November 2025. The final adjustment of last year nudged difficulty higher, but the broader trend has softened entering 2026.Higher difficulty translates into greater competition among miners, making block rewards harder to secure — a challenge compounded by economic and regulatory pressures that defined much of 2025. 2025 Was the Toughest Year Ever for Miner MarginsBitcoin miners endured what analysts describe as the most severe margin compression in history. The April 2024 halving cut block rewards in half, while rising energy costs, macroeconomic uncertainty, and a crypto market downturn further strained operations.The sell-off that began in November pushed BTC prices sharply lower, intensifying the pressure on mining profitability. Hash Price Fell Below Breakeven LevelsA key metric, miner hash price — which measures expected daily revenue per unit of computing power — dropped below critical thresholds late last year.Historically, miners face difficult decisions when hash price falls below $40 per petahash per second per day. In November 2025, that figure slid under $35, marking a multi-year low and forcing some operators to power down less efficient rigs. Additional Headwinds: Tariffs and Market VolatilityU.S. tariffs introduced under President Donald Trump also weighed on mining companies, raising concerns about ASIC supply chain disruptions and increased hardware costs.Meanwhile, a sharp market correction triggered by an October flash crash sent Bitcoin prices down more than 30% in November, briefly pushing BTC to just above $80,000.Although Bitcoin has since rebounded, prices remain well below the October all-time high above $125,000, keeping miner profitability under pressure as 2026 begins. Outlook for Bitcoin Mining in 2026The slight drop in mining difficulty may offer temporary relief, but ongoing volatility, energy costs, and regulatory uncertainty suggest miners will continue to face a challenging environment.With difficulty expected to trend higher again, efficiency, access to low-cost energy, and scale will remain critical for miners hoping to survive and thrive in the evolving Bitcoin mining landscape.

Bitcoin Mining Difficulty Drops in First Network Adjustment of 2026

On-chain analyst Willy Woo has pushed back strongly against growing claims that Bitcoin’s four-year market cycle has come to an end, arguing that current price data still aligns with the traditional cyclical structure — at least through 2026.Woo believes recent skepticism stems from misinterpretations of short-term data and social media narratives, not from structural evidence that Bitcoin’s cycle has fundamentally changed. The “Heartbeat” Analogy: Why Cycles Still MatterTo explain his position, Woo used a medical analogy. Just because a heartbeat slows during sleep doesn’t mean the heart has stopped beating. Similarly, slight changes in the timing or intensity of Bitcoin’s price movements do not signal the disappearance of its four-year rhythm.According to Woo, external factors such as ETFs, macroeconomic conditions, or liquidity injections may alter the pace of the cycle, but the underlying supply-and-demand pulse — driven largely by halvings — remains intact.Until Bitcoin’s price action moves deeper into 2026 and displays clearly non-cyclical behavior, Woo argues the four-year model is still the most reliable framework. Industry Leaders Argue the Cycle Is ObsoleteWoo’s view contrasts with opinions from several high-profile crypto figures. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan and researcher Ryan Rasmussen have suggested that Bitcoin has entered a new era, where the traditional halving-driven boom-and-bust cycles are significantly weakened.Their argument centers on the rise of spot Bitcoin ETFs and institutional capital, which they believe are smoothing volatility and preventing the extreme 70–80% drawdowns seen in earlier cycles.From this perspective, Bitcoin is transitioning into a longer, more stable bull market, rendering the classic four-year cycle less relevant. A More Mature Bitcoin Market?Other analysts interviewed by Bitcoin.com News share this outlook, emphasizing that ETF flows and macroeconomic forces now play a greater role in price discovery than miner reward halvings.They argue Bitcoin is increasingly behaving like a mature financial asset — with slower appreciation, fewer crashes, and stronger correlation to global liquidity trends — rather than a purely halving-driven speculative market.In this view, Bitcoin’s future may resemble traditional markets: steadier growth instead of explosive cycles. Woo Responds to Criticism and Reaffirms His ThesisAddressing personal criticism online, Woo rejected claims that a hedge fund he managed collapsed in 2020.“That was not my fund,” Woo clarified. “My first fund, Crest, launched in 2022 and is still operating today with consistent returns. We currently run three institutional funds, including SyzCrest in partnership with Syz Banking Group.” What Still Drives the Four-Year Cycle?When asked what continues to support Bitcoin’s cyclical behavior, Woo pointed to two core forces: The internal supply shock caused by Bitcoin halvingsThe global four-year liquidity cycle, which influences risk-on and risk-off market behaviorWoo noted that Bitcoin has historically led broader macro markets into risk-off phases on three prior occasions. Whether the current environment represents the fourth instance remains under debate — but it would still fall within Bitcoin’s entire historical lifespan.Supporters of Woo’s thesis also highlight ongoing government stimulus and liquidity injections, arguing that once this capital filters through risk assets, it could reignite the cyclical expansion pattern observed in previous Bitcoin cycles. Bottom LineWhile institutional adoption and ETFs have undeniably changed Bitcoin’s market structure, Willy Woo maintains that the four-year cycle is not dead — only evolving. Until price action decisively proves otherwise, he believes dismissing the cycle entirely is premature.

Willy Woo Defends Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle, Rejecting Claims That the Pattern Is Dead

Businessman with pensive portrait tablet, red bitcoin chart with

Despite being widely viewed as fundamentally undervalued, Bitcoin is expected to remain stuck in a bear market phase as analysts see no immediate catalyst for a strong upside move.After a highly volatile period in October and November 2025, Bitcoin has entered a phase of consolidation, trading within a narrow $85,000–$90,000 range for several consecutive weeks. Market observers say this sideways action could continue well into 2026. Analysts Expect Range-Bound Bitcoin Price ActionAccording to Gerry O’Shea, Head of Global Market Insights at Hashdex, potential catalysts do exist — including shifts in U.S. monetary policy or progress on crypto regulation in Congress — but none appear imminent.“For now, Bitcoin is firmly range-bound,” O’Shea said, adding that while bullish developments are possible, the market lacks the momentum needed to break higher in the short term.Jim Ferraioli, Director of Crypto Research at Schwab’s Center for Financial Research, shared a similar outlook. While Schwab remains constructive on Bitcoin’s long-term prospects, Ferraioli expects 2026 to be a quieter year for crypto markets. Market Digesting a Massive Multi-Year RallyFerraioli noted that the current slowdown reflects a natural cooling period after an extended bull run.“From the November 2022 lows to the October 2025 peak near $126,000, Bitcoin delivered nearly an 8x return in three years,” he said. “The market is still absorbing those gains.”Since that peak, on-chain activity has declined, transaction fees have remained low, and long-term holders have gradually reduced exposure. At the same time, spot Bitcoin ETF flows have become the dominant price driver, replacing organic network usage as the primary market signal. ETF Flows Now Drive Bitcoin’s Short-Term DirectionThe rise of Bitcoin ETFs has increased accessibility for investors but may also be distorting short-term market dynamics.“Exchange balances hit historic lows, long-term holders were selling, and price action became almost entirely dependent on ETF flows,” Ferraioli explained. “But true institutional capital is still largely absent.”According to Ferraioli, clearer regulatory frameworks could unlock deeper institutional participation — a development he views as essential for a sustainable next rally. Bitcoin Narrative Stalls as Institutional Demand CoolsHyunsu Jung, CEO of Hyperion DeFi, said Bitcoin’s investment narrative has lost urgency, particularly as ETF inflows slowed after an early-2025 surge. Without renewed demand from institutions or a significant macroeconomic shift, Jung expects continued sideways movement.Will Reeves, CEO of fintech firm Fold, described the situation as a waiting game. “Bitcoin is deeply undervalued,” he said. “But the market needs persistent sellers to fully exhaust before a new wave of buyers can step in.” Is Bitcoin Still in a Bear Market?Whether the current phase qualifies as a full-blown crypto winter remains debated. Ferraioli believes Bitcoin meets the classic definition of a bear market, though he emphasized that sharp corrections are normal given the asset’s volatility.“A 30% drawdown is almost expected for Bitcoin,” he said.While Bitcoin often shows periods of correlation with equities, Ferraioli stressed that its long-term drivers remain unique — including fixed supply growth, global liquidity conditions, and adoption trends.“The biggest unknown for 2026 is adoption,” he concluded. “That’s what will ultimately determine Bitcoin’s next major move.”

Bitcoin “Deeply Undervalued” but Bear Market Likely to Persist Without a Clear Catalyst

Live On Bitcoin

I am building a website in which I wanna provide bitcoin education including:

Bitcoin education (why it's the hardest money humanity ever had)
Bitcoin self-custody including nodes for full privacy (full set up guidance)
Market Analysis
Bitcoin Mining (consultation, sales, hosting services)

Live On Bitcoin

Bitcoin News

Do you buy lottery tickets ? There is a better alernative.

Eliminating the Biggest Myths About Stablecoins, Banking,...

Why Bitcoin Mining May Be One of the Most Important Clima...

Bitcoin Mining Difficulty Drops in First Network Adjustme...

Willy Woo Defends Bitcoin’s Four-Year Cycle, Rejecting Cl...

Bitcoin “Deeply Undervalued” but Bear Market Likely to Pe...